Projected Impact of Omidubicel-onlv on Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (Allo-HCT) Outcomes in Hematologic Malignancies.

INTRODUCTION: In a phase III clinical trial (NCT02730299), omidubicel-onlv, a nicotinamide-modified allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell therapy, showed rapid hematopoietic and immune recovery compared with standard umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplant across all racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: A decision-tree model was used to project the effect of omidubicel-onlv availability on addressing health disparities in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) access and outcomes for patients with hematologic malignancies. The model used a hypothetical population of 10,000 allo-HCT-eligible US adults, for whom matched related donors were not available. Patients received matched or mismatched unrelated donor, haploidentical, UCB transplant, or no transplant. Scenarios with omidubicel-onlv use of 0% (status quo), 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30% were modeled on the basis of proportional reductions in other allo-HCT sources or no transplant by racial/ethnic group. RESULTS: Increased omidubicel-onlv use was associated with a higher proportion of patients undergoing allo-HCT, decreased time to allo-HCT, decreased 1-year non-relapse mortality, and increased 1-year overall survival, particularly among racial minorities. In the scenario modeling 20% omidubicel-onlv use, the proportion of Black patients receiving allo-HCT increased by 129%; increases were also observed in Asian (64%), Hispanic (45%), and other (42%) patient groups. Modeled time to allo-HCT improved among transplanted patients (23%) from 11.4 weeks to 8.8 weeks. One-year OS in the overall population increased by 3%, with improvements ranging from 3% for White patients to 5% for Black patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that broad access to omidubicel-onlv could increase access to allo-HCT and improve outcomes for patients, with the greatest benefits seen among racial/ethnic minority groups.

Real-world use and clinical impact of an electronic patient-reported outcome tool in patients with solid tumors treated with immuno-oncology therapy.

BACKGROUND: Utilization of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) tools to monitor symptoms in patients undergoing cancer treatment has shown clinical benefits. Tennessee Oncology (TO) implemented an ePRO platform in 2019, allowing patients to report their health status online. We conducted a real-world, multicenter, observational, non-interventional cohort study to evaluate utilization of this platform in adults with solid tumors who initiated immuno-oncology (IO) therapy as monotherapy or in combination at TO clinics. METHODS: Patients initiating IO therapy prior to platform implementation were included in a historical control (HC) cohort; those initiating treatment after implementation were included in the ePRO cohort, which was further divided into ePRO users (platform enrollment ≤ 45 days from IO initiation) and non-users. Data were extracted from electronic medical records; patients were followed for up to 6 months (no minimum follow up). Outcomes included patient characteristics, treatment patterns, duration of therapy (DoT), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Data were collected for 538 patients in the HC and 1014 in the ePRO cohort; 319 in the ePRO cohort were ePRO users (uptake rate 31%). Baseline age was higher, more patients had stage IV disease at diagnosis, and more received monotherapy (82 vs 52%, respectively) in the HC vs the ePRO cohort. Median follow-up was 181.0 days (range 0.0-182.6) in the HC and 175.0 (0.0-184.0) in the ePRO cohort. Median DoT of index IO regimen was 5.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4-NE) in the HC cohort vs not estimable (NE) in the ePRO cohort. Multivariable regression adjusting for baseline differences confirmed lower risk of treatment discontinuation in the ePRO vs HC cohort: hazard ratio (HR) 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.97); p < 0.05. The estimated 6-month OS rate was 65.5% in the HC vs 72.4% in the ePRO cohort (p < 0 .01). Within the ePRO cohort, DoT of index IO regimen and OS did not differ between users and non-users. In ePRO users, patient platform use was durable over 6 months. CONCLUSION: Improvements in DoT and OS were seen after ePRO platform implementation. Conclusions are limited by challenges in separating the impact of platform implementation from other changes affecting outcomes.

Health care costs among patients with hematologic malignancies receiving allogeneic transplants: a US payer perspective.

ABSTRACT: Patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) require extensive care. Using the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database (2016 Q1-2020 Q2), we quantified the costs of care and assessed real-world complication rates among commercially insured US patients diagnosed with a hematologic malignancy and aged between 12 and 64 years undergoing inpatient allo-HCT. Health care resource use and costs were assessed from 100 days before HCT to 100 days after HCT. Primary hospitalization was defined as the time from HCT until first discharge date. Incidence of complications was assessed using medical billing codes from HCT date to 100 days after HCT. Among the 1082 patients analyzed, allo-HCT grafts included peripheral blood (79%), bone marrow (11%), and umbilical cord blood (3%). In the 100 days after HCT, 52% of the patients experienced acute graft-versus-host disease; 21% had cytomegalovirus infection. The median primary hospitalization length of stay (LOS) was 28 days; 31% required readmission in first 100 days after HCT. Across the transplant period (14 days pretransplant to 100 days posttransplant), 44% of patients were admitted to the intensive care unit with a median LOS of 29 days. Among those with noncapitated health plans (n = 937), median cost of all-cause health care per patient during the transplant period was $331 827, which was driven by primary hospitalization and readmission. Additionally, the predicted median incremental costs per additional day in an inpatient setting increased with longer LOS (eg, $3381-$4071, 10th-20th day.) Thus, decreasing length of primary hospitalization and avoiding readmissions should significantly reduce the allo-HCT cost of care.

Real-World Outcomes of Trilaciclib Among Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Trilaciclib was recently approved in the USA for reducing chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression (CIM) among adults with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) when administered prior to chemotherapy. There is limited understanding of real-world outcomes of trilaciclib. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using a keyword search in the MEDLINE, Embase, and conference abstracts. Additional studies were identified through communications with the authors of relevant studies. Published and unpublished real-world studies of trilaciclib- and comparable non-trilaciclib-treated patients with ES-SCLC were included. Evidence on myelosuppressive hematologic adverse events (HAEs), cytopenia-related healthcare utilization, and other reported outcomes (e.g., hospitalizations, dose reduction, and treatment delay) were synthesized. If feasible, outcomes were compared qualitatively between the trilaciclib and historical reference groups, and between first-line trilaciclib initiators and the overall trilaciclib population. Weighted averages were estimated for selected outcomes using sample size as the weight. RESULTS: The literature search identified five unique studies based on eight records-two included trilaciclib only, two non-trilaciclib only, and one both. In trilaciclib cohorts, the weighted average prevalence of grade ≥ 3 myelosuppressive HAEs in ≥ 1 lineage, ≥ 2 lineages, and all three lineages was 40.5%, 14.5%, and 7.5%, respectively. All rates were numerically lower compared to the historical non-trilaciclib cohorts (58.8%, 28.0%, 13.0% respectively). Cytopenia-related healthcare utilization was also lower in the trilaciclib cohorts. In general, first-line trilaciclib initiators had numerically lower myelosuppressive HAEs and cytopenia-related healthcare utilization than the overall trilaciclib patients. CONCLUSIONS: The existing evidence suggests that trilaciclib may reduce single and multilineage grade ≥ 3 myelosuppressive HAEs and cytopenia-related healthcare utilization among patients with ES-SCLC in the real world. It is a promising new treatment for CIM prevention in ES-SCLC and may bring greater benefits to first-line trilaciclib initiators. Future studies are recommended to further evaluate the real-world effectiveness of trilaciclib.

Economic Impact of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection in the USA: A Systematic Literature Review and Cost Synthesis.

INTRODUCTION: Up to 35% of patients with a first episode of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) develop recurrent CDI (rCDI), and of those, up to 65% experience multiple recurrences. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to review and summarize the economic impact of rCDI in the United States of America. METHODS: English-language publications reporting real-world healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and/or direct medical costs associated with rCDI in the USA were searched in MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases over the past 10 years (2012-2022), as well as in selected scientific conferences that publish research on rCDI and its economic burden over the past 3 years (2019-2022). HRU and costs identified through the SLR were synthesized to estimate annual rCDI-attributable direct medical costs to inform the economic impact of rCDI from a US third-party payer's perspective. RESULTS: A total of 661 publications were retrieved, and 31 of them met all selection criteria. Substantial variability was found across these publications in terms of data source, patient population, sample size, definition of rCDI, follow-up period, outcomes reported, analytic approach, and methods to adjudicate rCDI-attributable costs. Only one study reported rCDI-attributable costs over 12 months. Synthesizing across the relevant publications using a component-based cost approach, the per-patient per-year rCDI-attributable direct medical cost was estimated to range from $67,837 to $82,268. CONCLUSIONS: While real-world studies on economic impact of rCDI in the USA suggested a high-cost burden, inconsistency in methodologies and results reporting warranted a component-based cost synthesis approach to estimate the annual medical cost burden of rCDI. Utilizing available literature, we estimated the average annual rCDI-attributable medical costs to allow for consistent economic assessments of rCDI and identify the budget impact on US payers.

Physician perceptions of drug utilization management: Results of a national survey.

The use of drug utilization management techniques such as formulary exclusions, prior authorizations, and step edits has risen sharply during the last decade, contributing to the growing burden on physicians and patients. Limited quantitative data exist, however, on physician perceptions of drug utilization management. A national survey was conducted between February 9 and March 30, 2021, targeting office-based physicians working in the United States to assess their perceptions on drug utilization management in their practice. Of the 742 physicians that participated in the study, over 80% reported deciding against prescribing certain treatments in anticipation of drug utilization management at least sometimes (>50% of the time). Despite utilization management having an impact on prescribing decisions, about half of physicians said that the utilization management policies they encounter rarely or never (0-25% of the time) align with clinical evidence.

The Physician and Administrator-Reported Cost of Drug Utilization Management to Physician Practices: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

BACKGROUND: The use of drug utilization management techniques such as formulary exclusions, prior authorizations, and step edits has risen sharply during the last decade, contributing to growing administrative costs for physician practices. However, limited data exist on the extent of these administrative costs, with previous studies relying on data from over a decade ago. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess physician and practice administrator experiences with drug utilization management. METHODS: A national survey was conducted between 9 February and 30 March 2021, targeting 925 physicians and administrators working at medical practices in the US. Time spent by physicians and their staff on tasks related to drug utilization management for prescription medications was collected and used to calculate the dollar value of that time. RESULTS: We estimated that physicians spent a median of 4.0 h per week on drug utilization management, while nurses spent 15.0 h and other staff spent between 3.6 and 10.0 h on drug utilization management per physician per week. This time was associated with a calculated median dollar value of $75,927 per physician per year. Extrapolating this estimate to a national scale suggests that time spent annually by physician practices on drug utilization management could be valued at more than $43 billion. CONCLUSIONS: Drug utilization management results in significant time spent by US physician practices, which in turn, results in meaningful costs to these practices. As the prevalence of drug utilization management continues to grow, the impact on physician practices will remain an important topic.

Impact of clinical pathways on treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: real-world evidence from a community oncology practice.

Introduction: The evolving treatment landscape for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and complexities of regulations and reimbursement present challenges to community oncologists. Clinical pathways are tools to optimize care, but information on their value in the real world is limited. This retrospective study assessed treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with stage I-III NSCLC pre- and post-pathways implementation at Tennessee Oncology, a large, community-based oncology practice in the USA. Methods & Materials: Chart data were abstracted for adults diagnosed with stage I-III NSCLC who received systemic treatment. Patients were divided into pre-pathways (treatment initiation 2014-2015) and post-pathways (treatment initiation 2016-2018) cohorts. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes were summarized descriptively. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess time-dependent outcomes, and log-rank test was used to compare the cohorts. Results: 291 patients were included (stage I-II: 38 pre-pathways, 55 post-pathways; stage III: 105 pre-pathways, 93 post-pathways). Duration on first-line (1L) therapy was similar for stage I-II patients pre- and post-pathways (median 1.9 months vs 2.1 months; p = 0.75), but increased for stage III patients post-pathways (2.1 months vs 1.4 months pre-pathways; p < 0.01). Achievement of a complete or partial response with 1L therapy was similar post-pathways among stage I-stage -IIII patients (60.0% vs 55.2% pre-pathways), but increased for stage III patients (56.0% vs 35.2% pre-pathways). Conclusion: Given that improvements in rates of treatment response post-pathways occurred only for patients diagnosed with stage III NSCLC, among whom immunotherapy uptake increased post-pathways, such improvements may be attributable to evolving practices in cancer care, including advances in treatment and care delivery, rather than clinical pathways implementation. Further research is warranted to assess the impact of clinical pathways in the current treatment era, given that immunotherapy has now become the standard of care in NSCLC.